Samweorc:Gemǽnscipe Ingang

Fram Wikibooks
(Edlǣded fram Wikibooks:Bot policy)
Gān tō: þurhfōr, sēcan

Wilcume

Wilcume tó Wicibócum! Ic hopie þæt gé forðiaþ oft and micle! --James 01:01, 14 Mǽdmónaþ 2005 (UTC)

Sumu helpfullu word

Boc liber, stsef littera, leaf folium, tramet pagina --James 01:01, 14 Mǽdmónaþ 2005 (UTC)

Request

Hi, I am user meta:user:Walter. I respectfully request this community to consider my following request; I write a newsletter about what is going on in the Wikimedia projects in all languages. It is my hope that every community, like this one, has some people who read Wikizine. Then I can maybe receive some news from those readers about your project and in the other direction the can inform there community in your own language about the Wikimedia news possibly. I would like to ask this community to include on your local "Village pump" page, community portal or other relevant page a small banner for Wikizine.

I could find your local village pump. This is the reason I have posted this here.

If a banner is placed on the correct page the change that someone here will think about Wikizine and report some local news will increase highly I suspect. Or that people will take a look and read the Wikimedia news. And maybe even share it locally. Here are the banners; meta:Wikizine/banners

My apologies that this is in English and the Wikizine is also in English. But there is not other way to do this. If there are questions please ask it here. I will be watching this page for at least two weeks from now on frequently. Greetings, --Walter 16:51, 3 Wēodmōnaþ 2006 (UTC)

Magon wē macronas brūcan?

Iċ sēo þæt brȳcþ þes tramet "accute" mearca... magon wē hit āwendan, swā wierþ hit macronas habban?

Wōdenhelm 08:30, 4 Hrēþmōnaþ 2008 (UTC)

Bot flag request for User:Circolwyrde

  • Bot operator: User:White Cat (Commons:User:White Cat) - En-N, Tr-4, Ja-1
  • List of botflags on other projects: Bot has a flag on wikimedia (meta,commons) wikipedia (ar, az, de, en, es, et, fr, is, ja, ku, nn, no, ru, sr, tr, uz, simple...) (See: m:User:White Cat#Bots)
  • Purpose: Interwiki linking, double redirect fixing, commons delinking (for cases where commonsdelinker fails)

-- Cat chi? 18:13, 14 Hrēþmōnaþ 2008 (UTC)

Gódne Dæg

Gódne dæg; ic wille, þæt man wríte léasungspell and úpgiefe hí þám Engliscan léasungwici, gif hí swá willen, on ænigre gelimpunge. Hwæt gelimpeþ hérbe tó þisre tíde? Gott wisst 05:19, 14 Þrimilcemōnaþ 2009 (UTC)

Bot policy

Hello. To facilitate steward granting of bot access, I suggest implementing the standard bot policy on this wiki. This will involve creating a redirect to this page from Project:Bot policy, and adding a line at the top noting that it is used here. In particular, this policy allows automatic acceptance of known interlanguage linking bots (if this page says that is acceptable), which form the vast majority of such requests.

Please read the text at m:Bot policy before commenting. If you object, please say so; it will be implemented in one week if there is no objection, since it is particularly written to streamline bot requests on wikis with little or no community interested in bot access requests.

-- Cat chi? 02:49, 15 Hrēþmōnaþ 2008 (UTC)

Implemented. —Pathoschild 13:06:09, 19 Ēastermōnaþ 2010 (UTC)

Bot policy update

Hello. To facilitate steward granting of bot access, I suggest implementing the standard bot policy on this wiki. In particular, this policy allows stewards to automatically flag known interlanguage linking bots (if this page says that is acceptable), which form the vast majority of such requests. The policy also enables global bots on this wiki (if this page says that is acceptable), which are trusted bots that will be given bot access on every wiki that allows global bots.

This policy makes bot access requesting much easier for local users, operators, and stewards. To implement it we only need to create a redirect to this page from Project:Bot policy, and add a line at the top noting that it is used here. Please read the text at m:Bot policy before commenting. If you object, please say so; I hope to implement in two weeks if there is no objection, since it is particularly written to streamline bot requests on wikis with little or no community interested in bot access requests. Carsrac 05:34, 3 Winterfylleþ 2009 (UTC)

Implemented. —Pathoschild 13:06:09, 19 Ēastermōnaþ 2010 (UTC)

Closure discussion

This project is being considered for closure here. 24.178.137.65 04:09, 10 Winterfylleþ 2010 (UTC)

Closure proposal

This project is once again being considered for closure: m:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Old English Wikibooks 2. This, that and the other (talk) 07:02, 21 Se Æfterra Gēola 2013 (UTC)

 :( It looks as though this has no chance of failing. Even though the project has content. PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:27, 7 Hāligmōnaþ 2013 (UTC)


IMPORTANT: Admin activity review

Hello. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc) was recently adopted by global community consensus (your community received a notice about the discussion). According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on smaller wikis. To the best of our knowledge, your wiki does not have a formal process for removing "advanced rights" from inactive accounts. This means that the stewards will take care of this according to the new admin activity review here.

We have determined that the following users meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for more than 2 years):

  1. James (administrator)

These users will receive a notification soon, asking them to start a community discussion if they want to retain some or all of their rights. If the users do not respond, then their advanced rights will be removed by the stewards.

However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the stewards on Meta-Wiki so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki. Thanks, QuiteUnusual (talk) 14:31, 9 Gēolmōnaþ 2013 (UTC)